Video 1
Techniques-
Testimonial: Emeril
Fallacies-
agrgumentum ad ignorantiam: People don't know what's actually going on
observational selection: Pointed out all the "good" things going on but not the actual bad things.
Videos 2 and 3
Techniques-
Transfer: Associates BP with the positive image of the Olympics
Fallacies-
non sequitor: The association of the two don't follow or make sense
red herring: They try to divert the attention of the spill over to the Olympians
Video 4
Techniques-
Plain Folks: People just like us
Fallacies-
half truths: They support many jobs but ignore the fact of the bad oil spill
Maranda,
ReplyDeleteMagnificent job with LFs, especially argumentum ad ignorantiam. I appreciate you going above and beyond determining multiple LFs, but where is your analysis of Testimonial/Plain Folks?
You are also missing one video clip.